Bad Theology

Posted: Monday, September 6, 2010 by Morgan in
4

I've been increasingly disappointed with the theology at George Fox. It seems to become less and less biblically sound every time I go to chapel or a spiritual life event.


GFU is fairly liberal for a Christian school, and unfortunately their theology follows the same lines. The university pastor is a woman, which isn't necessarily unbiblical, but in this context it does seem to violate the biblical principle of male leadership. Each time I have heard her pray she addresses the Holy Spirit rather than God the Father or Jesus, which also isn't necessarily unbiblical but a little concerning. She also called us Sons of Christ rather than Sons of God (which is straight up biblically incorrect. See Romans 8:16-17 if you're skeptical).

But that's the least of my worries.

To open chapel today, the pastor read from Matthew 13:31-46, which contains Jesus' parables about the kingdom of heaven. She talked about the mystery of God and the difficulty of understanding Him (the verse she used was 1 Corinthians 13:12 from The Message translation, the veracity of which is questionable. See What kind of message is The Message?).

"I'm sure you've had lots of conversations about the mystery of God and at some point in the conversation you're having this big theological discussion and at some point someone says, 'Well I think we should believe the Bible.' Well what do you say to that? 'I don't think we should believe the Bible?' All of a sudden it's like throwing that trump card in that says, 'Well if you just read it right here it gets really clear.' Well, actually what they mean is that you should read their version of how they think about the Bible because they're the ones that have the exact unparadoxical unmysterious knowledge and they're able to just tell you exactly what it says. But instead we find a God that has wide open space and that we can come in at different angles into God and experience all that God has for us. There's so much paradox in God...

Here's what I get from that: Don't read the Bible because people misinterpret it. Just experience God. Either that or that understanding God is relative.

Later she said this: "The bible is full of questions, …. So to be in a place of asking questions to determine who God is and what God is about is the very heart of the gospel message because Christianity doesn't just have a lot of paradoxes, it's paradoxical…." (emphasis added).

Here's my question:

WHERE DO YOU GO FOR ANSWERS IF NOT TO THE BIBLE?!

You can't ask questions and hope the answers will just come to you in a vision. Seriously, God wrote the bible for a reason. He gives us ALL we need to know in it. It's not just a decent source of knowledge about God, it's THE source of knowledge about God. The bible is "able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Jesus Christ" (2 Timothy 3:14-17).

During the message, she shared a story about a pool that she bought on a whim against the better judgment of her husband. She said, and I quote: "I kind of thought that perhaps some of the regulations about the pool were more suggestions." So she set it up right next to her house without leveling the ground and dumped bleach into the water instead of using the filter. (It seems she treats the bible much the same way as these directions.) Guess what happened? It turned out badly. The pool turned into a mosquito breeding ground and they had a terrible time emptying it because they set it up right next to the house. If that isn't an illustration on the merits of male leadership and the consequences of disregarding God's perfect, well thought-out design for our lives, I don't know what is.

Here is a caption from a powerpoint slide she used (it is also the GFU Spiritual Life Twitter account status, so it must have been a fairly important quote): "when you are immersed in God, you find that the paradoxes of Christianity don't drown you, but give your faith buoyancy." She expanded on this by saying that we can only really begin to understand the mystery of God unless we "get in the water." These paradoxes and mysteries can only be understood in the context of immersion in God.

Again I ask:

HOW DO YOU IMMERSE YOURSELF IN GOD WITHOUT GOING TO THE BIBLE?!

Perhaps most concerning is the misinterpretation of scripture at the end of chapel. The pastor used the parable of the merchant to illustrate the fact that, not only is does the treasure represent the kingdom of heaven for us, but that MORE IMPORTANTLY we are the treasure for Jesus. Almost like He needs us. Which is not true. God is triune and perfect, not needing anything or anyone but Himself. He gave us the opportunity to spend eternity with Him not because He needed to give it to us, but because of who He is, because he is both loving and just. Here's a real paradox: He punishes sin and grants mercy at the same time through the death and resurrection of His son Jesus Christ, who is the perfect sacrifice that was made for all sin (Hebrews 10, 1 Corinthians 15, Romans 5, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John). That's just the gospel, plain and simple.

I am saddened by the prevalence of this sketchy theology in a Christian university. The college age is one of the most important for development of ideology, character, belief systems, etc., and I don't think I can sit idly by and let this flawed teaching wash over the better part of 2000 young men and women who will go out into the world and be witnesses for Christ. I want to do something about it. I want to change chapel for the better. I want to be taught from the scriptures, not from stories about pools or cleverly organized curricula based on the word "mystery."

Teach me the Bible, please. That's all I need.


"All scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be competent, equipped for every good work." 2 Timothy 3:16-17

4 comments:

  1. Matt says:
    This comment has been removed by the author.
  1. Matt says:

    Obviously I wasn't there, but these are my thoughts based on what you wrote about her:

    1) I don't think she was trying to devalue the Bible. The paragraph that begins with "I'm sure you've had..." is not necessarily saying the Bible is relative or unable to answer our questions, but that if you approach the Bible without sensitivity to the incredible difficulty and diversity present in interpretation and application then you'll end up like that one guy who just assumes *his* reading is the correct one, ignoring the vital factors of context, language and time which all play a huge role in how we understand the Bible (not saying the truth of the Bible is culturally relative, but that our understanding of the Bible is).

    2) What was her point with the pool story? I highly doubt it was just to serve as a foil for complementarians. I would also say that, while I believe in complementary order in the household, saying that this serves as an awesome example of why it should be so is sort of strange. Male leadership is not important because it stops women from being totally stupid (as you seemed to imply) but for the sake of order as God intended.

    3) The Bible is not just an answer book. A large part of our Bible reading experience is confusion and wonder as we struggle to understand such difficult things. Only God can grant us the ability to understand His Word. This does not mean that the Bible is answerless, of course not, but rather it is a paradox due to the fact that it cyclically calls us to ask deep, thoughtful questions and then also provides us hope and assurance in those matters. Take the issue of war and violence: By reading the Bible carefully the question of how we reconcile the warring "God of the OT" with Christ's commands to love and never judge or carry out vengeance? This is a HUGE question with HUGE implications, and people can argue both sides using the Bible well. I am a pacifist, my mentor is not, and we both use the Bible. See the problem? The Bible is a paradox because it is both the cause and solution to our questions, but only insofar as God grants us insight, so we must be immersed in Him for the Bible to make sense....another paradox because God is revealed to us through His Word.

    4) As to the parable...well, it's a growing theory that that is the way to interpret it. Look at the parable of the lost lamb, the prodigal son, the lost coin...how much does God love us and treasure us!!! The prodigal son *is* the treasure of the Father, the lamb *is* beyond precious to the Shepherd. Yes, God does not need us, but He does love us immensely beyond our comprehension as a father loves his children. Not saying I agree with the theory of how to interpret this parable, but the theology of us being God's beloved is pretty sound.

    Those are just my thoughts. Be discerning and thoughtful as you are, but always covered in grace and a willingness to understand (different from agreeing). Since I wasn't there I don't know if anything I said intersects with the reality of what she said, but I hope it did at least a little

  1. Morgan says:

    Hey Matt thanks for checking this out and thinking critically about it. I want to interact with others' beliefs/opinions (that's partially why I started this blog thing).

    1) No matter what she was trying to do in the first paragraph, she certainly DID devalue the Bible, at least in my view. The tone and context of this section of the message cast those who think they "should just believe the Bible" in a negative light. Sure, there are different ways to interpret some parts of the Bible, but much of it is VERY clear about many things, including its own veracity and usefulness for understanding God. Sure, there ARE those who misinterpret those parts of the Bible, but it's an incorrect generalization to group all who "believe the Bible" with them.

    2) I'm not sure what the point of the pool story was, and I'm not saying that proof of complementarianism was her point. It just happened to be a good example of it. I emphatically do NOT think the point of male headship is to reign in "totally stupid" women.

    3) I never claimed the Bible was just an answer book. That's certainly part of what it does though. In my religion class, we just finished going over a chapter called "God, Hidden, and Universal," which presents God as an almost unknowable deity (I happen to disagree with this to some degree). He has revealed Himself to us through His word. Granted, there are some things we can't understand or comprehend (the nature of the Trinity, predestination AND freewill, God's eternal existence and omniscience, etc.), but again, God reveals much to us in the Bible that we CAN understand. Christianity is not just one big paradox.

    4) Sure, other parables DO show how much God loves and values us. Why not use those parables to illustrate that point?

  1. Anonymous says:

    The Message is not a translation; it is a paraphrase.